Difference between revisions of "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics/Chapter 1/Problems"
(→1.14.c) |
(→1.14.b) |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
{\partial^2 \over \partial x^2} \Psi &= {\partial \over \partial x}{\partial \over \partial x} \Psi \\ | {\partial^2 \over \partial x^2} \Psi &= {\partial \over \partial x}{\partial \over \partial x} \Psi \\ | ||
− | &={\partial \over \partial x}\left( {-2 a m x \over \hbar} \Psi \right) \\ | + | &= {\partial \over \partial x}\left( {-2 a m x \over \hbar} \Psi \right) \\ |
− | &={\partial \over \partial x}\left( {-2 a m x \over \hbar}\right) \ | + | &= {-2 a m \over \hbar}{\partial \over \partial x}(x \Psi) \\ |
− | + {-2 a m x \over \hbar}{\ | + | &= {-2 a m \over \hbar}\left({\partial \over \partial x}(x)\Psi + x{\partial \over \partial x}\Psi\right) \\ |
− | &= { | + | &= {-2 a m \over \hbar}\left(\Psi + x {-2 a m x \over \hbar} \Psi \right) \\ |
+ | &= {-2 a m \over \hbar}\left(1 + x {-2 a m x \over \hbar} \right) \Psi \\ | ||
+ | &= {-2 a m \over \hbar}\left(1 - {2 a m x^2 \over \hbar} \right) \Psi \\ | ||
+ | &= {2 a m \over \hbar}\left({2 a m x^2 \over \hbar} - 1 \right) \Psi \\ | ||
+ | &= {2 a m \over \hbar}\left({2 a m x^2 \over \hbar} - {\hbar \over \hbar} \right) \Psi \\ | ||
&= {2 a m \over \hbar^2} (2 a m x^2 - \hbar) \Psi \\ | &= {2 a m \over \hbar^2} (2 a m x^2 - \hbar) \Psi \\ | ||
\end{align} | \end{align} | ||
Line 71: | Line 75: | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
\begin{align} | \begin{align} | ||
− | i\hbar {\partial \Psi \over \partial t} | + | i\hbar {\partial \Psi \over \partial t} &= - {\hbar^2 \over 2m} {\partial^2 \Psi \over \partial x^2} + V \Psi \\ |
− | + | i\hbar (-ai \Psi) &= - {\hbar^2 \over 2m} {2am \over \hbar^2} (2amx^2 - \hbar) \Psi + V \Psi \ | |
− | i\hbar (-ai \Psi) | + | a \hbar \Psi &= - a (2amx^2 - \hbar) \Psi + V \Psi \\ |
− | + | a \hbar &= - a (2amx^2 - \hbar) + V \\ | |
− | a \hbar \Psi | + | V &= a \hbar + a (2amx^2 - \hbar) \\ |
− | + | &= 2 a^2 m x^2 | |
− | a \hbar | ||
− | |||
− | V &= a \hbar | ||
− | |||
\end{align} | \end{align} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
I'm pretty sure I've made several mistakes. I have to go over this carefully to see where. [[User:Jgardner|Jgardner]] 22:18, 3 May 2012 (MDT) | I'm pretty sure I've made several mistakes. I have to go over this carefully to see where. [[User:Jgardner|Jgardner]] 22:18, 3 May 2012 (MDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I caught the mistake. I had lost a negative sign in the x derivative term. [[User:Jgardner|Jgardner]] 01:30, 4 May 2012 (MDT) | ||
== 1.14.c == | == 1.14.c == |
Revision as of 00:30, 4 May 2012
Contents
1.14
1.14.a
To find A, all we have to do is normalize the wave function.
<math> \begin{align} 1 &= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^*\Psi\ dx \\
&= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} A e^{-a[(mx^2/\hbar)-it]} A e^{-a[(mx^2/\hbar)+it]}\ dx \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} A^2 e^{-2a(mx^2/\hbar)}\ dx \\ &= A^2 \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-2a(mx^2/\hbar)}\ dx & & \text{I had to look up how to solve this integral.}\\
\end{align} </math>
How do you solve the integral above?
First, we substitute <math>b = {2am \over \hbar}</math> for simplicity. (These are all constants.)
Next, we note that this looks like the Gaussian integral. Although no definite integral exists, <math>\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^-{x^2}\ dx = \sqrt{\pi}</math>.
Now all we have to do is eliminate the coefficient of x in the exponent. We can do this with integration by substitution, using <math>y^2 = b x^2,\ x = {y \over \sqrt{b}},\ dx = {1 \over \sqrt{b}}dy</math>
- <math>
\begin{align} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{-bx^2}\ dx
&= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} {1 \over \sqrt{b}} e^{-y^2}\ dx \\ &= \sqrtTemplate:\pi \over b \\ &= \sqrtTemplate:\pi \hbar \over 2am \\
1 &= A^2 \sqrtTemplate:\pi \hbar \over 2am \\ A^2 &= \sqrtTemplate:2am \over \pi \hbar \\ A &= \sqrt[4]Template:2am \over \pi \hbar \\ \end{align} </math>
1.14.b
The derivatives are not that hard.
<math> \begin{align} {\partial \over \partial t} \Psi &= {\partial \over \partial t}\left( A e^{-a[(mx^2/\hbar)+it]} \right ) \\ &= {\partial \over \partial t}\left( A e^{-a(mx^2/\hbar)}e^{-ait} \right ) \\ &= A e^{-a(mx^2/\hbar)}{\partial \over \partial t} e^{-ait} \\ &= A e^{-a(mx^2/\hbar)}(-ai) e^{-ait} \\ &= -ai A e^{-a[(mx^2/\hbar)+it]} \\ &= -ai \Psi \\
{\partial \over \partial x} \Psi &= {\partial \over \partial x}\left( A e^{-a[(mx^2/\hbar)+it]} \right ) \\ &= A e^{-ait} {\partial \over \partial x} e^{-a(mx^2/\hbar)} \\ &= A e^{-ait} e^{-a(mx^2/\hbar)} {\partial \over \partial x} [-a(mx^2/\hbar)] & & \text{Chain rule.} (f(g))' = f'(g)g';\ f = e^x;\ g = -a(mx^2/\hbar) \\ &= A e^{-ait} e^{-a(mx^2/\hbar)} [-a(2mx/\hbar)] \\ &= {-2 a mx \over \hbar} A e^{-a[(mx^2/\hbar)+it]} \\ &= {-2 a mx \over \hbar} \Psi \\
{\partial^2 \over \partial x^2} \Psi &= {\partial \over \partial x}{\partial \over \partial x} \Psi \\ &= {\partial \over \partial x}\left( {-2 a m x \over \hbar} \Psi \right) \\ &= {-2 a m \over \hbar}{\partial \over \partial x}(x \Psi) \\ &= {-2 a m \over \hbar}\left({\partial \over \partial x}(x)\Psi + x{\partial \over \partial x}\Psi\right) \\ &= {-2 a m \over \hbar}\left(\Psi + x {-2 a m x \over \hbar} \Psi \right) \\ &= {-2 a m \over \hbar}\left(1 + x {-2 a m x \over \hbar} \right) \Psi \\ &= {-2 a m \over \hbar}\left(1 - {2 a m x^2 \over \hbar} \right) \Psi \\ &= {2 a m \over \hbar}\left({2 a m x^2 \over \hbar} - 1 \right) \Psi \\ &= {2 a m \over \hbar}\left({2 a m x^2 \over \hbar} - {\hbar \over \hbar} \right) \Psi \\ &= {2 a m \over \hbar^2} (2 a m x^2 - \hbar) \Psi \\ \end{align} </math>
Let's plug & chug.
<math> \begin{align} i\hbar {\partial \Psi \over \partial t} &= - {\hbar^2 \over 2m} {\partial^2 \Psi \over \partial x^2} + V \Psi \\
i\hbar (-ai \Psi) &= - {\hbar^2 \over 2m} {2am \over \hbar^2} (2amx^2 - \hbar) \Psi + V \Psi \ a \hbar \Psi &= - a (2amx^2 - \hbar) \Psi + V \Psi \\ a \hbar &= - a (2amx^2 - \hbar) + V \\ V &= a \hbar + a (2amx^2 - \hbar) \\ &= 2 a^2 m x^2
\end{align} </math>
I'm pretty sure I've made several mistakes. I have to go over this carefully to see where. Jgardner 22:18, 3 May 2012 (MDT)
I caught the mistake. I had lost a negative sign in the x derivative term. Jgardner 01:30, 4 May 2012 (MDT)
1.14.c
<math> \begin{align} \langle x \rangle
&= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* x \Psi\ dx \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} x \Psi^* \Psi\ dx \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} x A^2 e^{-2amx^2/\hbar}\ dx & & \text{Note that }x e^{-bx^2}\text{ is odd.} \\ &= 0 & & \text{Centered at the origin.} \\
\langle x^2 \rangle
&= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* x^2 \Psi\ dx \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} x^2 A^2 e^{-2amx^2/\hbar}\ dx \\ &= {A^2 \sqrt{\pi} \over \left(2am / \hbar\right)^{3/2}} \\ &= {\sqrt{2am \pi} \hbar^{3/2} \over \sqrt{\pi \hbar} (2am)^{3/2}} \\ &= {\hbar \over 2am} & & \text{Looks like it is spread out a bit.}\\
\langle p \rangle
&= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* (-i \hbar) {\partial \over \partial x} \Psi\ dx \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* (-i \hbar) {-2 a mx \over \hbar} \Psi\ dx \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* 2 a m x i \Psi\ dx \\ &= 2 a m i \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} x \Psi^* \Psi\ dx & & \text{Odd function. (See above)} \\ &= 0 & & \text{It looks like it has an equal chance of going left or right.} \\
\langle p^2 \rangle
&= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* \left((-i \hbar) {\partial \over \partial x}\right)^2 \Psi\ dx \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* (-\hbar^2) {\partial^2 \over \partial x^2} \Psi\ dx \\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* (-\hbar^2) {2 a m \over \hbar^2} (2 a m x^2 - \hbar) \Psi\ dx \\ &= -2am \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* (2 a m x^2 - \hbar) \Psi\ dx \\ &= -2am \left( \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* 2amx^2 \Psi\ dx - \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* \hbar \Psi\ dx \right) \\ &= -2am \left( 2am \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* x^2 \Psi\ dx - \hbar \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \Psi^* \Psi\ dx \right) & & \text{We've already done these integrals, remember?} \\ &= -2am ( 2am \langle x^2 \rangle - \hbar) \\ &= -2am ( 2am {\hbar \over 2am} - \hbar) \\ &= -2am ( \hbar - \hbar) \\ &= 0 & & \text{That particle is really staying put!}\\
\end{align} </math>
I have to admit, the result for <math>\langle p^2 \rangle</math> surprises me a great deal. I'd expect it to be non-zero, so that <math>\sigma_p</math> would be non-zero. I obviously made a mistake. Jgardner 01:01, 4 May 2012 (MDT)